Free Essays on Gibbons vs. Ogden

Gibbons vs. Ogden In the court case Gibbons vs. Ogden, the Supreme Court reviewed the commerce power held by Congress. The Supreme Court decided that commerce was not simply defined as traffic or the mere buying or selling of goods. Justice John Marshall explains the commerce clause as, â€Å"Commerce undoubtedly is traffic, but is something more – it is intercourse. It describes the commercial intercourse between nations, and part of nations, in all its branches, and is regulated by prescribing rules for carrying on that intercourse† (McClenaghan 265). Woodrow Wilson once described the Supreme Court as a constitutional convention in a continuous session. In a constitution convention, the Constitution was written and interpreted. In the Supreme Court case Gibbons vs. Ogden, the Supreme Court uses the power of judicial review to interpret a part of the Constitution, this shows the relationship between a Supreme Court and Constitutional Convention. The laws of New York granting to Robert R. Livingston and Robert Fulton the exclusive right of navigating the waters of that State with steamboats are in collision with the acts of Congress regulating the coasting trade, which, being made in pursuance of the Constitution, are supreme, and the State laws must yield to that supremacy, even though enacted in pursuance of powers acknowledged to remain in the States. The power of regulating commerce extends to the regulation of navigation. The power to regulate commerce extends to every species of commercial intercourse between the United States and foreign nations, and among the several States. It does not stop at the external boundary of a State. But it does not extend to commerce, which is completely internal. The power to regulate commerce is general, and has no limitations but such as is prescribed in the Constitution itself. The power to regulate commerce, so far as it extends, is exclusively vested in Congress, and a State.A licens e unde... Free Essays on Gibbons vs. Ogden Free Essays on Gibbons vs. Ogden Gibbons vs. Ogden In the court case Gibbons vs. Ogden, the Supreme Court reviewed the commerce power held by Congress. The Supreme Court decided that commerce was not simply defined as traffic or the mere buying or selling of goods. Justice John Marshall explains the commerce clause as, â€Å"Commerce undoubtedly is traffic, but is something more – it is intercourse. It describes the commercial intercourse between nations, and part of nations, in all its branches, and is regulated by prescribing rules for carrying on that intercourse† (McClenaghan 265). Woodrow Wilson once described the Supreme Court as a constitutional convention in a continuous session. In a constitution convention, the Constitution was written and interpreted. In the Supreme Court case Gibbons vs. Ogden, the Supreme Court uses the power of judicial review to interpret a part of the Constitution, this shows the relationship between a Supreme Court and Constitutional Convention. The laws of New York granting to Robert R. Livingston and Robert Fulton the exclusive right of navigating the waters of that State with steamboats are in collision with the acts of Congress regulating the coasting trade, which, being made in pursuance of the Constitution, are supreme, and the State laws must yield to that supremacy, even though enacted in pursuance of powers acknowledged to remain in the States. The power of regulating commerce extends to the regulation of navigation. The power to regulate commerce extends to every species of commercial intercourse between the United States and foreign nations, and among the several States. It does not stop at the external boundary of a State. But it does not extend to commerce, which is completely internal. The power to regulate commerce is general, and has no limitations but such as is prescribed in the Constitution itself. The power to regulate commerce, so far as it extends, is exclusively vested in Congress, and a State.A licens e unde...

Theoretical Background on Spending Habits Essays

Theoretical Background on Spending Habits Essays Theoretical Background on Spending Habits Paper Theoretical Background on Spending Habits Paper Students all over the world spend in several different ways, but close market research on student spending indicates that there are several common patterns that can be seen. Spending habits in adolescents is changing drastically in the last few years, but that change is almost uniform in all the metros of the world. Commercialization has begun targeting students spending habits a very long time ago. IFIM Students Lifestyle and Spending Habits , 2009) According to a study conducted by a bank and financial institution, youths fork over money to buy cellphone load, to play computer games at Internet cafes and to buy cigarettes and alcohol. They also spend money on going out and on clothes and accessories. (TJ Manotoc, ABS-CBN News, 2010) Teens hang out and shop. Teens are active consumers in terms of the money they spend, as well as in the influence they wield in their families and on societal trends. Despite being raised in a period of rapid change, they display a remarkable self-confidence in their judgment. (Tempo, 2010) A lot of the number of students seem to wants what is the â€Å"in† trend, what people are doing or using â€Å"right now†. Most teens will usually have one or two sources of income, either allowance from their parents or a job. The answer to this question isnt found by looking at the income of the family or social status, its more a way of living and rearing that the parents have given their children. Felipe, 2007) â€Å"Despite the Filipino teens’ having limited budget to spend, low price does not necessarily make any brand a shoo-in for their patronage,† explained Ming Barcelona, TNS Philippines Associate Research Director. â€Å"The TRU study reminds us the mindsets, preferences and purchasing habits of Filipino teens, whether on brand values, the latest product offerings, or on values and social issues should not be ignored,† added Gary de Ocampo, TNS Philippines Managing Director.

Case study Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Case study - Essay Example Acquisition or alliance is a kind of strategy where a company purchases ownership stakes of another company in order to capture a particular target market. These strategies are also considered as among the pertinent growth strategies of companies in today’s business environment (Sherman, 2010). Many of the companies have come up with such strategies in the recent years. The latest company that has incorporated this strategy is Facebook. The company acquired the stakes of Instagram. It is the company that provides online services such as photo sharing as well as social networking for the users. The company has more than 30 million users worldwide with a total valuation of the firm of around US$20 million. Facebook, a social media giant offered a price of US$1 billion to purchase the stakes of the company. This acquisition will enhance the position of Facebook in front of its competitors, as through the assistance of it the company can provide finest photo sharing experience to its users all around the globe. This is also considered as among the key growth strategies of Facebook (Wharton, 2012; Kosner, 2012; BBC, 2012). This essay will analyse the entire case about the acquisition approach of Facebook and discuss the various threats and opportunities for the company. Furthermore, the essay will also analyse the methods of strategic development and evaluate the ones that will be applicable in Facebook’s acquisition of Instagram. In the later part of the essay, TOWS matrix will be used to analyse the strategic decisions of Facebook and Instagram regarding the acquisition. Strategic Opportunities and Threats of Facebook It can be observed from the analysis of the case study that Facebook will have certain opportunities as well threats as a result of its approach of acquisition of Instagram. There are certain potential benefits for the company. Opportunities It has been determined that owing to the acquisition of Instagram Facebook will strengthen its p osition in front of its major rivals in the market. Acquisition of Instagram will benefit Facebook users quite considerably. Facebook always intended to provide best photo sharing experiences to the customers or users. In this regard, the acquisition will enable the company to accomplish the aforesaid goal as Instagram is capable of delivering best photo sharing experiences for the users. In addition, the applications provided by Instagram will facilitate users of Facebook to leverage instant filters facility, which will be quite unique. This is also among the major opportunities for Facebook. Furthermore, it has been learnt that pictures and images taken from mobile devices appear to be blurred and ordinary. This aspect of photo viewing experience will be completely changed with the inception of the alliance of Facebook with Instagram as the later will enhance the quality of pictures captured and they can also be easily shared. Moreover, pictures taken with the help of cell phones cannot be processed before uploading them to Facebook, but with the help of